Copyright and Contracts

In our lecture today we discussed copyright and contracts. Copyright is defined as ‘The exclusive and assignable legal right, given to the originator for a fixed number of years, to print, publish, perform, film, or record literary, artistic, or musical material.’ by the Oxford Dictionary. Personally, copyright is a simply a reassuring factor that my creative material won’t be stolen. As well as copyright, we discussed contracts. More importantly, contracts while working with other people. This interested me greatly as i’ve had many projects fall through because of lack of communication and understanding.


When creating a film, you need to have as much documentation supporting you as possible. I’m currently producing a short and I had no idea how many contracts you actually needed. We’ve got location forms, casting forms, equipment forms, funding forms and most importantly, group contracts. The group work contract is probably the most important while creating something with others. All parties must agree to the terms and see them through. If this contract fails/isn’t put into place, the likelihood of the entire project falling apart is incredibly high.


Screen Shot 2016-06-23 at 12.45.49 PM.png

Screen Shot 2016-06-23 at 12.46.01 PM.png

Screen Shot 2016-06-23 at 12.46.02 PM.pngIn our lecture, we filled out a contract found online (it’s not an offical legally binding contract, but it’s close). What i learnt is that copyright is not fun and in fact it can be quite boring to figure out. But it’s so so important to know. Especially in the creative industries. There have been so many cases of copyright infringement that results in creative people losing credit, money and respect.

A great example of copyright infringement is the case of Rogers vs Koons. Art Rogers shot  a photo of a couple of a couple holding a line of puppies in 1985.

copyright infringement

In 1988 artist Jeff Koons created statues for his art exhibit based off the photograph by Rogers. Koons sold several of the statues and made a significant profit before Rogers found out and sued him for copyright.

Jeff Koons claimed he was parodying the work however the court found that there were too many similarities between the two. Koons was forced to pay a monetary settlement to Rogers. This case was huge in the art world as many people started to question if you could still use other work to influence your own.

It’s a fine line between inspiration and stealing and I think the copyright laws help protect your creative work from being ‘stolen’. That being said, I do believe that people should be able to take direct inspiration without it being considered a copyright infringement.


Art Rogers vs. Jeff Koons. (2011, December 20). Retrieved June 22, 2016, from
Eliison, K. (2013, April 19). 5 famous copyright infringement cases (what you can learn). Retrieved June 22, 2016, from

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s